Hi @tylerjw, what's the status of this? Is there anything I can do to help move this along, like run CI?

The issue is the regular expression for parsing the output doesn't work with newer versions of clang-tidy. I haven't had a chance to try to update the regular expression yet. I think the next step is figuring that out. I specifically want to use this with clang-tidy-10 as it is what we are using on the moveit project.

Any chance that you're going to land this pr @tylerjw ?

I stopped working on this because we transitioned to using industrial_ci on GitHub actions for moveit and that project has a nice interface for running clang-tidy. I can put this on my list of things to do but it might be a while as we don't need this any more for the moveit project. Anyone else is welcome to take over this PR and finish it.

@wmmc88 with #316 newer versions of clang-tidy can be found however other than the search order hard-coded in the source there is no control over which available clang-tidy binary is used. https://github.com/nuclearsandwich/ament_lint/blob/6f39d0b6a5b7428d085e5a40d3c57ed7c3e88a32/ament_clang_tidy/ament_clang_tidy/main.py#L115-L118

@wmmc88 with #316 newer versions of clang-tidy can be found however other than the search order hard-coded in the source there is no control over which available clang-tidy binary is used. https://github.com/nuclearsandwich/ament_lint/blob/6f39d0b6a5b7428d085e5a40d3c57ed7c3e88a32/ament_clang_tidy/ament_clang_tidy/main.py#L115-L118

Nice! Are those changes backported to foxy?